The Truthslinger
.
— Truth Slinger X (@TruthSlingerX) February 22, 2025
Nero fiddled as Rome burned... and so does Janet Mills
What a reckless ideologue burning taxpayer money on things no one wants like biological boys in girl's bathrooms.#TNN #PTP #mepolitics #Maine pic.twitter.com/nr2Agatd9C
Last year I overcame my allergy to social media enough to dive deeper into the cesspool on X, formerly Twitter. I’d always known it is the haunt of men while Fakebook haunts the ladies. I didn’t reckon with how addictive the scrolling could become when you limit the post length to a snipe or insult. It seems to fit my emotional state better than Zuck’s offering. The insulters X while the emoters Zuck, I guess.
Another aspect of X that appears unique to me is the sophisticated use of anonymous accounts. I’d always equated that use of the internet with the darker corners of the web. I didn’t think of it as powerful and effective on an American Big Tech platform. How wrong I was.
Some great political work is being done by keyboard warriors on X. I’ve highlighted one Mainiac above. Tim and Jen produce a two hour morning LIVEstream on X every weekday. His brand, “WARTIME Preacher, Patriot & COMMIE SLAYER.” He fully identifies with Jesus Christ, salting his narrative with F bombs, smoking pot and tolerating sodomy among adults. I’ve personally heard him defend powerful Right wing Pro Trump sodomites Richard Grenell and Scott Presler. And in a weird sort of way I love him for it.
Christians are familiar with a Gospel story where John asked Jesus to stop a non-follower from casting out demons. Jesus answered, “Do not stop him, for the one who is not against you is for you.” That’s the way I think about Tim and Jen. He, and the keyboard warriors he runs with on X, are literally casting demons out of two school boards that are local to me. He may choose not to be my follower after reading this blog post because I choose not to smoke pot, throw F bombs and approve of adult sodomy. I, however, can assure everyone that I’m not going to do anything to interfere with his X activism as long as he’s casting demons into the abyss.
And boy does Maine ever need her political demons to be exorcised at the moment. One need look no further than the shameful behavior of Jezebel Janet Kills attempting to work her witchcraft on Donald Trump in HIS White House. Talk about an exorcism. Wow. And the whole world is watching. It couldn’t happen to a more deserving Maine political family and individual.
The Mills family is guilty. Maine voters, especially Christians, are complicit. Christians are required to demonstrate not just common sense, but a theological sense. As religious people they have a duty to defend their morals in reference to religion, especially against political push back. This is precisely what the Christian Civic League of Maine and the Maine Diocese of the Roman Catholic Church decided not to do many years ago. Maine Christianity conceded to entirely non-religious argumentation in favor of sexual immorality. They adopted the political strategy of hunkering down inside their stained glass fortresses.
Consequently the defense of the moral law now falls to the likes of Donald Trump and my pot smoking friends Tim and Jen. Trump tolerates sodomy. It’s no surprise his defenders would adopt the same political posture.
And that’s why I have to admit that I love all of them in a weird sort of way.
Amen.
Interesting article. I do not approve of sodomy, of course. I simply do not use it as a purity test to whether someone will serve well in government. I don’t care for sodomite teachers at all. If someone is truly saved, the sodomy will work itself out… and if not, them God may show them favor as he did David. To me it’s a rib issue (in politics). Now the Catholic Church? The Protestant Church? That’s different too. Very nuanced.
I see “If they are not against us, they are for us” as a battlefield analysis tool. Look up and see which direction our people are going. I’d rather have an honest sodomite than a dishonest heterosexual. Depending on the circumstance… it is a “rob issue” to me. If we are talking about accomplishing a political job, I would prefer an honest homosexual (or garden variety sinner) that might yet repent over a sleazy, lying heterosexual. The competency is important too. We are not a theocracy, and sexual preference should not be a PURITY TEST. We are in danger when we apply purity tests.
In my church, should I plant one, it is a spinal issue. Can’t serve a Church in open sin. Sodomy is sin… and I would only allow someone to attend provided they had counseling and abstained from the behavior if they seek God. We would also expect people to abstain from any behavior that could become an idol before God… gambling, lying, coveting. They are all sins.