Comments for Michael Stuart Heath

Comment on At Least I Know the FBI will See This Post by Paul

Paul — Mon, 15 Dec 2025 18:18:56 +0000

No! I don’t really think it’s a waste of time. It’s well worth the effort to have a clear understanding of the who the people are, what they plan to do.and how they plan to achieve their goal!

Comment on Tucker Vs. Cruz — “Be a Little Less Snarky” by Michael Heath

Michael Heath — Sun, 22 Jun 2025 09:44:35 +0000

In reply to BT. Good to know. The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit isn't conspiratorial. It's documented from the beginning of recorded history. The fact that Copilot would hint that it is "conspiratorial" is evidence enough of a bias in the programming. Like callously throwing around the ill-defined epithet "antisemitism."

Comment on Tucker Vs. Cruz — “Be a Little Less Snarky” by BT

BT — Sun, 22 Jun 2025 09:18:31 +0000

In reply to Michael Heath. I disagree that AI’s programming is atheistic… at least “Copilot.” It has given some remarkable Christian orthodox responses to questions I’ve posed. I’ve not extensively challenged Copilot on the jewish revolutionary spirit you’ve referenced, but it has resisted yet acknowledged without a vitriolic response a direction into conspiratorial kind of my queries.

Comment on Tucker Vs. Cruz — “Be a Little Less Snarky” by Michael Heath

Michael Heath — Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:29:44 +0000

In reply to Susan. Thanks for the thoughtful comment. I'd love to see much more religious dialogue at all levels of global communications. It seems AI and algorithms are atheist in orientation, so internet communications in general end up serving as a psychological operation that discourages religion in particular.

Comment on Tucker Vs. Cruz — “Be a Little Less Snarky” by Susan

Susan — Fri, 20 Jun 2025 02:01:34 +0000

I wish Trump would invite priests, rabbis and theologians to the Oval Office, let them hash it all out. What nobody ever mentions anymore is that this is the Holy Land we’re talking about, with Jerusalem now serving now as a magnet for bombs and mayhem. When will sanity prevail? I don’t blame “the Jews” for this, I blame Theodore Herzl, who led the world away from right reason

Comment on How Maine Became a Gay Brothel by P Jay

P Jay — Sat, 10 May 2025 21:04:50 +0000

1. What war the gays won? Where we at war with people for who they love or go to bed with?
2. Why would any parent think they have a right “to interfere with the sexual and gender development” of their children? Do you really think that if you had gay parents, they could make you being sexually attracted to men?
3. How do homosexuals have “the exclusive right to define everything, especially the meaning of words”? What do you exactly mean? As far as I know, language is a dynamic process that reflects the ongoing interaction between human societies and their languages, leading to the evolution of linguistic systems over time. Look at Aramaic which is one language used in portions of the Old Testament. Do people still speak Aramaic in its original form?
4. How do homosexuals forbid criticism and what criticism they forbid? Are you talking about you criticizing their morals or who they love? Do you allow strangers coming to you and tell you what you do in bed with your spouse is immoral and you’ll go to hell for it? Would you allow the government imposing prohibitions on who you can love and marry?
5. As an uncle of a woman with gender dysphoria who never transitioned to be a man because of the disapproval and rejection from the other side of her family, I can guarantee you that there is no greater hate towards children than rejecting them for being gay or trans. Adults telling their children their gay or trans identities are an abomination, and who refuse to listen to them do not love their children; they love themselves more and reject their children because they can only accept their own reality.
6. What do you mean we have descended to the lowest level of hell? Just because gays and trans? As a Christian you should know that even during biblical times, gender non conforming individuals existed. The Bible even talks about eunuchs who were born that way, those who were made eunuchs by others, and those who chose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Isaiah 56:4-5 promises eunuchs who keep the Sabbath a place in the temple and a name better than sons or daughters. The ancient Hebrew Scriptures like the Talmud even acknowledges gender categories beyond from the binary perspective. Society has become more accepting due to acquired knowledge, but earth has not descended to the lowest of Hell for it, rather your views and knowledge have not progressed. I remember growing up in the 70-80s how adults use to say the exact same thing just because of rock & roll, heavy metal as the women’s rights movement and liberation.

Your blog’s post share no reasonable arguments to sway anyone’s opinion because it is just a random rant without substance.

Comment on King Cannot Think by AL COOPER III

AL COOPER III — Thu, 06 Mar 2025 13:09:39 +0000

MIKE ITS ABOUT TIME SOMEONE EXPOSED THE LIE’S THAT KING IS WANTING US TO BELIEVE. TRUMP IS RIGHT ON BY PULLING OUT BEFORE WORLD WAR THREE HAPPENS. AL

Comment on The Truthslinger by TruthSlinger

TruthSlinger — Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:53:08 +0000

Interesting article. I do not approve of sodomy, of course. I simply do not use it as a purity test to whether someone will serve well in government. I don’t care for sodomite teachers at all. If someone is truly saved, the sodomy will work itself out… and if not, them God may show them favor as he did David. To me it’s a rib issue (in politics). Now the Catholic Church? The Protestant Church? That’s different too. Very nuanced.

I see “If they are not against us, they are for us” as a battlefield analysis tool. Look up and see which direction our people are going. I’d rather have an honest sodomite than a dishonest heterosexual. Depending on the circumstance… it is a “rob issue” to me. If we are talking about accomplishing a political job, I would prefer an honest homosexual (or garden variety sinner) that might yet repent over a sleazy, lying heterosexual. The competency is important too. We are not a theocracy, and sexual preference should not be a PURITY TEST. We are in danger when we apply purity tests.

In my church, should I plant one, it is a spinal issue. Can’t serve a Church in open sin. Sodomy is sin… and I would only allow someone to attend provided they had counseling and abstained from the behavior if they seek God. We would also expect people to abstain from any behavior that could become an idol before God… gambling, lying, coveting. They are all sins.

Comment on Candace Owens on Birth Control by Paul Madore

Paul Madore — Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:51:22 +0000

This is awesome! The social doctrines, the doctrine of Social Reign of Christ the King! are finally starting to see the light of day!

Comment on NO MORE DISTILLED SPIRITS: A CALL TO REPENTANCE AND FEROCIOUS TRUTHFUL ENGAGEMENT by Michael Heath

Michael Heath — Thu, 07 Mar 2024 17:27:24 +0000

Thank you, Paul, for this comment. I so appreciate your friendship. I also thank you for your service on the Board of the League while I was leader many years ago. I pray many honest Christians will see your comment, and follow up with you.